Los Angeles Times
November 6, 2008
Lawyers for same-sex couples argued that the anti-gay-marriage measure was an illegal constitutional revision -- not a more limited amendment, as backers maintained -- because it fundamentally altered the guarantee of equal protection. A constitutional revision, unlike an amendment, must be approved by the Legislature before going to voters. (Link)
Learn more about California.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment