The Washington Post
August 31, 2009
The Justice Department's new brief in the recently dismissed Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer v. U.S. case fulfills its duty to "defend a federal law with which it doesn't agree [DOMA] without dabbling in noxious, outdated and irrelevant arguments." [Link]
Monday, August 31, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment